October 29, 2020

Leadership and Supervision Action Plan Essay

10 min read

Leadership and Supervision Action Plan
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

Leadership and Supervision Action Plan
Section 1
Developing Effective Organizational and Interpersonal Communication Skills
Goal 1: Be recognized by my associates as one with effective oral, written, and presentation capabilities when communicating about my worries, opinions, and interests, Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1 to 5. 1 – Appropriate, 2 – adequate, 3 – slightly better, 4 – great, and 5 – excellent (Congress, 2017). The goal will be achieved when all assessments get a score of four or higher.
Objective 1: I will request my close colleagues to share their opinions regarding my capacity to engage in effective oral and written communication when relaying my concerns, views, and interests. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1 to 5 used to match the goal above. I will request the colleagues to suggest areas that I need to improve.
Objective 2: I will apply the suggestions by the colleagues as noted in objective 1 above to amend my development plan. The goal is to improve the way that I use oral and written communication to express my opinions and interests. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1 to 5 to match goal 1 in one month.
Goal 2: Be recognized as a person with high levels of integrity and responsibility in the way that I communicate to my colleagues in a way that expresses my reliability, accountability, and self-discipline (Congress, 2017). Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1 to 5 with the aspects highlighted in goal 1. The goal will be attained when I score four or higher.
Objective 1: I will consider the satisfaction levels and views of my colleagues by requesting them to provide opinions to determine my ability to build confidence among them concerning reliability, accountability, and self-discipline. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1 to 5.
Objective 2: I will use the responses given to me in objective 1 above to make changes to my action plan. I should improve on how I build confidence among my colleagues during communication. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 that meet goal 2.
Managing Time and Tasks Effectively
Goal 1: Be known as a person who keeps time and handles tasks appropriately within the set frameworks and standards (Tuten, Morris-Compton, Abrefa-Gyan, Hwang, & Harrington, 2016). Evaluation Method: Semantic differential scale with combinations of reliable v. unreliable, timely v. untimely, effective v. ineffective. The goal will be attained with positive responses.
Objective 1: I will rely on my supervisor to provide opinions regarding my ability to keep time and handle tasks appropriately. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with the aspects of goal 1.
Objective 2: I will use the responses provided by the supervisor to change my action plan for improvement. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale meeting positive targets of goal 1.
Goal 2: I will be recognized as a person who abides by the set schedules and timelines without failure in all my tasks. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with the same combinations as in goal 1. The goal will be achieved with positive reactions.
Objective 1: I will check my previous tasks to see if they were completed within the set timelines and schedules. Evaluation method: Semantic differentials scale to give a positive notion of the result.
Objective 2: I will check with my supervisor regarding my performance concerning adhering to deadlines. Evaluation method; semantic differentials scale. Objective will be achieved with positive response.
Managing Different Personalities and Traits
Goal 1: Identify and handle different personalities and traits depicted by my colleagues (Congress, 2017). Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with elements of 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree nor disagree, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree. The goal will be achieved with a score of 4 or above.
Objective 1: I will rely on my colleagues for responses. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 to respond to this; “I am able to handle your personalities and traits” using the elements in goal 1. They will also provide recommendations for improvement.
Objective 2: I will use the responses given by my colleagues to conduct amendments to my action plan. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 based on the elements in goal 1 with a score of four and above.
Goal 2: Distinguish my colleagues based on their personalities and traits into an ambitious and amiable, anxious warrior, and their temperaments ((Tuten et al., 2016). Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 based on elements in goal 1 with the statement “I am aware of your personalities and traits”. The goal is achieved when the score is 4 or above.
Objective 1: Compare my understanding of colleagues’ personalities with what they say in their responses. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with focus on elements in goal 2.
Objective 2: I will use the variations noted through the responses in objective 1 to change the action plan. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with focus on goal 2 elements.
Hiring, Performance Evaluation, Disciplinary Action, and Termination
Goal 1: Be capable of executing my employment and retaining process effectively through proper methods of hiring and performance assessment (Congress, 2017). Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with combinations of effective v. ineffective, appropriate v. inappropriate, capable v. incapable, and competent, v. incompetent. The goal is achieved with positive reactions.
Objective 1: Compare my actions with the best rated hiring and performance evaluation processes. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with combinations that help achieve goal 1.
Objective 1: Rely on my colleagues’ responses regarding my hiring and performance evaluation approaches. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with the same combination as goal 1.
Goal 2: Execute appropriate disciplinary actions and use the correct process of job termination. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with combinations as in goal 1. The goal will be achieved with positive responses.
Objective 1: Compare my practices with the best-ranked approaches for executing disciplinary action and terminations. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale.
Objective 2: Request my colleagues to give views regarding my method of issuing disciplinary actions and terminating people. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale.
Maintaining Ethics, Confidentiality, and Liability
Goal 1: I will be recognized as a person who complies with ethics in decision-making processes and instills confidentiality in all that I do. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with the elements of 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree nor disagree, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree. The goal will be achieved with a score of 4 or more.
Objective 1: I will compare my actions regularly with the code of conduct of the organization to determine compliance. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with elements in goal 1. I will assess my areas of improvement.
Objective 2: I will use my areas of improvement in objective 1 to make changes to my action plan in 2 months. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with the same elements to meet targets of goal 1.
Goal 2: I will be known as someone who takes responsibility for personal actions by assuming liability for my decisions. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with similar elements in goal 1. The goal will be attained with a score of 4 and above.
Objective 1: Conduct a self-reflection exercise on my past actions and decisions to determine my responsibility and accountability. Evaluation method: Self-reflection that would help determines my areas of weakness.
Objective 2: Apply the areas of improvement in objective one to make amendments to my action plan. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 that would match expected scores in goal 2.
Practicing Professional Development, Self-Care, Personal Reflection, and Self-Correction
Goal 1: I will be recognized as an individual who can improve on previous practices and efforts by engaging in self-reflection and practicing professional development in my field of work. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with 1-has a poor professional development plan, 3-good self-reflection approach, and development plan, 5-excellent personal reflection, and professional development. A score of more than 4 will achieve the goal.
Objective 1: Able by the provisions of my professional development plan. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 with the same metrics as in goal 1. I will recognize the areas of improvement through self-reflection.
Objective 2: I will use the noted areas of improvement in objective 1 to change my action plan. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 to achieve aspects of goal 1 above in two months.
Goal 2: I will be identified as a person who acknowledges my mistakes, including willing to conduct changes where necessary to enhance the success and improved professional growth. Evaluation method: Self-assessment based on my personal development goals. The goal will be achieved after the positive outcomes of the assessment.
Objective 1: I should note my areas of weakness and conduct amendments to my action plan. Evaluation method: Self-assessment to achieve goal 2.
Objective 2: I will seek help from my supervisor to note any areas that I can work on. Evaluation method: Self-assessment to achieve aspects of goal 2 above in 3 months.
Developing and Managing an Effective Culturally Competent Practice Including Organizational Culture and Environment
Goal 1: I will be noticed as a person who understands the culture and all its functions in human behavior and society. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with combinations of competent v. incompetent, knowledgeable v. unknowledgeable. The goal will be achieved through positive aspects.
Objective 1: I will have the knowledge base of my clients’ cultures and demonstrate competence in offering services. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale with combinations in goal 1.
Objective 2: I will improve my understanding based on loopholes noted in objective 1. Evaluation method: Self-assessment to determine if goal 1 has been achieved in 3 months.
Goal 2: Improve education and seek understanding of the nature of social diversity as well as discrimination in various aspects, including race, gender, and sex. Evaluation method: Semantic differential scale based on combinations in goal 1 above. The goal will be achieved with positive elements.
Objective 1: I will conduct a self-evaluation process to determine my understanding of the various aspects of social diversity and oppression. Evaluation method: Self-assessment.
Objective 2: I will conduct amendments to my action plan based on the results of my self-assessment. Evaluation method: Use key performance indicators self-fulfillment to reach targets noted in goal 2 above.
Being a Collaborative Leader in Training Supervisees in the Effective Use of Technology
Goal 1: Be recognized as a person who strives for the best for my supervisees by working collaboratively with colleagues to enhance the effective application of technology. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 consisting of 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree nor disagree, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree. Goal will be achieved with a score of 4 or above.
Objective 1: Rely on my supervisor to provide responses regarding my performance concerning collaboration in the last two months. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 based on combinations in goal 1.
Objective 2: I will ask my supervisees to rate my work in training them on effective use of technology. Evaluation method: Likert scale as in goal 1 above.
Goal 2: That I can plan appropriately to ensure that nothing is interrupted in the process of training supervisees on effective usage of technology. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 based on elements identified in goal 1. The goal is achieved with a score of 4 and above.
Objective 1: I will request my supervisees to provide views of their understanding of my training effectiveness. Evaluation method: Likert scale of 1-5 to achieve goal 2 above.
Objective 2: I will use the responses made in objective 1 above to make amendments on my action plan. Evaluation method: Self-assessment to make sure that the changes are achieved in two months.
Section 2
I can intentionally integrate leadership skills and the application of technology in supervisory skills while promoting advanced generalist practice. The advanced generalist practice is shaped by leadership, political, social, economic, cultural, geographic, and environmental aspects that are evolving unprecedentedly (Byrne, Kirwan, & Mc Guckin, 2019). I always ensure that electronic social work services are confidential at all times. For instance, the requirement is that information offered by clients should only be accessed by the authorized personnel that needs it. Requests for contents in the server ought to comply with the privacy standards of the social worker. As a leader, one needs to maintain clear professional boundaries (National Association of Social Workers, 2015). Social workers and leaders are required to be aware of boundary confusion that may emanate from the disclosure of personal details about themselves or other people online. In doing so, I will operate effectively and efficiently as a leader in advanced generalist practice.
Section 3
I can also incorporate current leadership and technology changes that happen in social work, especially those that lead to systematic transformations towards sustainability. Social workers have a duty of creating sustainability in the interventions with their clients (National Association of Social Workers, 2013). I will use my leadership skills and technology to sustain the supervision and a similar obligation when operating essay together with my supervisees by complying with standards associated with online and distance learning. Supervisees should be familiar with the ongoing practice, rules, ethical principles, and accreditations concerned with the application of technology (National Association of Social Workers, 2017). I will evaluate the sustainability of my skills by conducting self-assessments regularly in an interval of two months to monitor my progress. Some of the key performance indicators will include increased satisfaction of my supervisees and improved overall success in practice.

References
Byrne, J., Kirwan, G., & Mc Guckin, C. (2019). Social media surveillance in social work: Practice realities and ethical implications. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(2-3), 142-158.
Congress, E. P. (2017). What social workers should know about ethics: Understanding and resolving practice dilemmas. Social Work Ethics, 1(1), 1909-35.
National Association of Social Workers. (2013). Best practice standards in social work supervision. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GBrLbl4BuwI%3D&portalid=0
National Association of Social Workers. (2015). Standards and indicators for cultural competence in social work practice. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=PonPTDEBrn4%3D&portalid=0
National Association of Social Workers. (2017). NASW, ASWB, CSWE, & CSWA standards for technology in social work practice. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lcTcdsHUcng%3D&portalid=0
Tuten, M., Morris-Compton, D., Abrefa-Gyan, T., Hwang, J., & Harrington, D. (2016). Predictors of the use of evidence-based interventions among National Association of Social Work (NASW) members. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(3), 253-262.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.